Stratsemble
The whole glass · a grid

Every strategy on every asset, honestly scored

Every one of the library's famous strategies, backtested on every famous asset over a fixed ~5-year window (costs & slippage on, no look-ahead, always measured against simply buying and holding), colored by the one honest question: did it beat buy & hold? Of the 2407 with enough trades and history to judge, only 698 — 29% — did. The rest is mostly red, and that is the point.

These are historical backtest verdicts, not live prices, not today's change, not signals, and not advice. A green tile only means a higher total return than holding the asset over this one past window — it is not risk-adjusted, not luck-checked, and says nothing about the future.

Beat buy & hold
698
Lagged buy & hold
1709
Hit rate
29%
Backtests judged
2407
+141 too thin
beat buy & holdlagged buy & holdtoo thin to score· each tile is one strategy-on-asset combo · click to run it yourself
Moving Average Crossover
MACD
RSI Reversion
Connors RSI-2
Bollinger Band Reversion
Bollinger Band Breakout
SuperTrend
Donchian Breakout
Stochastic Oscillator
Time-Series Momentum
Parabolic SAR
Ichimoku Cloud
ADX / DMI Trend
200-Day MA Regime
52-Week High Breakout
Keltner Channel Breakout
Heikin-Ashi Trend
Awesome Oscillator
Commodity Channel Index
Stochastic RSI
On-Balance Volume
Money Flow Index
Chaikin Money Flow
Aroon
Vortex Indicator
Fair Value Gap
False Break
TTM Squeeze
Stocks
How this is scored. The same honest engine as the rest of the site — next-open fills, costs & slippage on, closed-bar (no acting on prices you couldn't have known), measured against total-return buy & hold, over one fixed ~5-year window (as of 2026-10-27; a different window can give a different verdict). "Beat" means only a higher total return than holding, not a risk-adjusted or luck-checked edge. Showing the whole grid avoids cherry-picking within it, but three things it does not cure: the assets are a curated set of famous, still-trading, liquid names (survivorship); the strategies are a handful of canonical mechanisms (selection); and any single combo among 2548 tried can beat by chance (try enough and some will). Open any tile and stress it with the walk-forward, robustness and noise-floor checks before trusting it. These are mechanisms to test, not recommendations.

How this is computed → (closed-bar, costs on, vs buy & hold — the full method.)

Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. This is an educational, analytical tool — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. You make all decisions and execute on your own broker.

Hypothetical performance disclaimer (CFTC Rule 4.41)

HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.

Share the honest scoreboard

Most people are sold the strategies that win. The honest number is that only 29% of these famous strategy backtests beat simply buying and holding over this window — most lagged. Pass it on, or drop the live card on your own site.

Share on X
Put this honest scoreboard on your site

An auto-updating card of how many famous strategies actually beat buy & hold — the whole glass, winners and losers. Free to embed on any blog, newsletter or forum; it links back here.

<iframe src="https://stratsemble.com/embed/grid" width="520" height="400" style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="Stratsemble — honest backtest scoreboard"></iframe>