What fired today
The honest census, made live today — the strategies the census already scores, firing now on real names. Each is a fact to test yourself, shown with its full record: how often the rule worked, and how often it didn't.
As of Oct 28, 2026 · The whole census →
Produced by the operator, who designs and runs the automated checks · Who runs Stratsemble →
The Stochastic RSI rule triggered on AAPL on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 6 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 4 in 10 closed in the red (46 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -5%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 4 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.52 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on AMAT on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (56 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +7%; a typical one that closed down about -6%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 1.07× an ordinary day for this name.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on AMGN on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (68 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Quality not established
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.05x assets)
- heavy debt (3.2 years of earnings to repay it)
Today's move is about 0.36 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on AMZN on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (65 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.01x assets)
Today's move is about 0.24 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The MACD rule triggered on AVGO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (57 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +8%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.85 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on AVGO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (57 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -5%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.85 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Vortex Indicator rule triggered on BAC on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (52 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.15 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on BNB on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (69 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +5%; a typical one that closed down about -6%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.15 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Vortex Indicator rule triggered on BNB on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (92 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.15 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Stochastic RSI rule triggered on BRK-B on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 7 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 3 in 10 closed in the red (51 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 3 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 1 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
- sales shrinking (-1.0% year on year)
Today's move is about 0.42 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on BTC on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (108 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.41 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Awesome Oscillator rule triggered on CMCSA on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (28 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 8 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
- sales shrinking (-0.0% year on year)
Today's move is about 0.4 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Connors RSI-2 rule triggered on COST on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 6 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 4 in 10 closed in the red (27 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -1%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 4 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.59 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on DIA on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (163 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -1%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.29 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Connors RSI-2 rule triggered on DIS on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (21 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -1%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.61 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on DOGE on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (118 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.41 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on DOGE on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (216 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.41 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on DOT on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (134 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.12 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on GE on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (52 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.05x assets)
Today's move is about 0.39 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Vortex Indicator rule triggered on GE on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (62 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 4 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.05x assets)
Today's move is about 0.39 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on GILD on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (74 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.10x assets)
Today's move is about 0.03 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on GOOGL on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (150 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.54 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on HON on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (148 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.05x assets)
- margins eroding (-25.0pp)
Today's move is about 0.09 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Bollinger Band Breakout rule triggered on JNJ on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (27 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.36 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Aroon rule triggered on JPM on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (25 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 9 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.59 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Bollinger Band Breakout rule triggered on JPM on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (21 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +8%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 7 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.59 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Commodity Channel Index rule triggered on JPM on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (30 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.59 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on JPM on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (49 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.59 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Fair Value Gap rule triggered on KO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (64 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -1%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.35 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on LINK on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (133 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.33 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The On-Balance Volume rule triggered on LINK on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (38 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +21%; a typical one that closed down about -8%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.33 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on LTC on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (138 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.19 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on MDLZ on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (55 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- heavy debt (5.1 years of earnings to repay it)
- margins eroding (-10.8pp)
Today's move is about 0.37 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on MS on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (54 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +7%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 4 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.64 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on MU on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (69 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 1.22× an ordinary day for this name.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on MU on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (58 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -6%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 1.22× an ordinary day for this name.
The MACD rule triggered on ORCL on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (41 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +11%; a typical one that closed down about -7%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Quality not established
- burning cash (free cash flow -35.2% of sales)
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.09x assets)
- margins eroding (-4.0pp)
Today's move is about 2.11× an ordinary day for this name.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on ORCL on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (58 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +7%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 4 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Quality not established
- burning cash (free cash flow -35.2% of sales)
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.09x assets)
- margins eroding (-4.0pp)
Today's move is about 2.11× an ordinary day for this name.
The Fair Value Gap rule triggered on PEP on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (63 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -1%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.31 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Stochastic RSI rule triggered on PFE on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 6 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 4 in 10 closed in the red (48 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -5%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 4 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
- sales shrinking (-44.5% year on year)
Today's move is about 0.63 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Fair Value Gap rule triggered on PG on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 6 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 4 in 10 closed in the red (51 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +1%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 4 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.32 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on QCOM on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (66 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.19 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The 200-Day MA Regime rule triggered on RTX on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (15 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +15%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 32 weeks; about 9 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.01x assets)
Today's move is about 0.26 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The On-Balance Volume rule triggered on SBUX on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (23 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +6%; a typical one that closed down about -5%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 6 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.07 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Commodity Channel Index rule triggered on TMO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (31 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -4%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 4 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.03x assets)
Today's move is about 0.56 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The MACD rule triggered on TMO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (44 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 4 weeks; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
One quality flag
- earns little on what it owns (gross profit 0.03x assets)
Today's move is about 0.56 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on TMUS on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (57 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Clears the quality bars
Today's move is about 0.23 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on USO on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (168 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 6 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
- sales shrinking (-319.9% year on year)
Today's move is about 0.54 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Parabolic SAR rule triggered on VTI on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (60 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +2%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 5 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.36 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on XLK on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (59 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -2%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 5 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 3 months.
Not enough to grade
- only 0 of the three business checks both apply to this kind of company and have a number on file, so there is not enough here to call it sound
Today's move is about 0.41 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Chaikin Money Flow rule triggered on XRP on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (103 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +3%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 2 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.45 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The Heikin-Ashi Trend rule triggered on XRP on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (231 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +4%; a typical one that closed down about -3%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 1 week; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.45 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The MACD rule triggered on XRP on Oct 28's close.
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (61 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
A typical trade that closed up was about +16%; a typical one that closed down about -6%.
When it did close in profit it usually took about 3 weeks; about 7 in 10 times it had not reached a profit within 2 months.
Quality checks don't apply here
- business-quality checks apply to company stocks — not to this instrument type
Today's move is about 0.45 of an ordinary day for this name — nothing unusual yet.
The same list for everyone — not advice, and never from your account. You decide and execute on your own broker.
Only the names still in today's census — survivors. The ones that delisted or died are not here.
Measured over one mostly-rising market — a different regime can flip any of this.
How this is computed → (closed-bar, costs on, vs buy & hold — the full method.)
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. This is an educational, analytical tool — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. You make all decisions and execute on your own broker.
Hypothetical performance disclaimer (CFTC Rule 4.41)
HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.
By viewing Today's Setups, you agree to our Terms of Use and Disclaimer. Results are hypothetical and educational — not investment advice. You decide and execute on your own broker.