Does the Ichimoku Cloud strategy beat buy & hold on Silver (SLV ETF)? (SLV · backtested honestly)
The Ichimoku 'cloud' is a band built from midpoints of past highs and lows, displaced forward so it derives only from past data; price above it reads bullish.
Over this period, Ichimoku Cloud on Silver (SLV ETF) returned +108.9%, while simply buying and holding returned +120.7% — it lagged buy & hold by 11.8 points, with a worst drawdown of -37.1%. It traded 13 times and sat in cash about 45% of the time. It's a mechanism you test.
It lagged buy & hold over this window — that's a result, and a backtest you can kill for free just did its job. Re-tuning this same idea until it looks better only adds another shot at looking good by luck, so the honest next move is a fresh one: test a different strategy on Silver (SLV ETF), or build your own — free. Most ideas die cheaply right here, and that's exactly how the rare one that holds up gets found.
Or stop here — walking away from an idea that didn't beat simply holding is a result, not a failure.
Run it yourself
Change the parameters and the window, then re-run — no account needed.
Have your own idea for Silver (SLV ETF)? Build and honestly test your own strategy — no code, costs on, measured against buy & hold.
Build your own on Silver (SLV ETF) →Two real trades from this backtest
Shown at the modeled fills — entries at the next open; a stop at its level, or at that day's open if the day opened past it; a target at its level; costs on. A single trade is never a signal and says nothing about the next one — not the best or worst, a middling winner and a middling loser among the completed trades.
13 trades total — 4 winners, 9 losers (31% won). Below is one of each, not a scoreboard.
- Entry. A long entry fired; filled at the next open on 2022-01-19 at $22.01 — never the signal bar's own close.
- Held. 8 daily bars.
- Exit. Exited on 2022-01-31 at $20.75 (the exit rule fired (filled at the next open)).
- Result. -5.82% after costs.
The worst single trade in this whole test reached -10.31%.
- Entry. A long entry fired; filled at the next open on 2022-10-24 at $17.66 — never the signal bar's own close.
- Held. 79 daily bars.
- Exit. Exited on 2023-02-16 at $19.74 (the exit rule fired (filled at the next open)).
- Result. +11.68% after costs.
Trading costs + slippage (0.10%) are already deducted from every figure above. One trade is never the edge — it's the whole distribution (the win rate, the losers, the reality-check) that matters; this just makes the mechanics concrete. It describes the past; it is not a prediction.
A live badge that re-runs itself and links back here. Free to embed on any blog, newsletter or forum — it shows the honest result, beat or lagged.
<iframe src="https://stratsemble.com/embed/silver-ichimoku-backtest" width="360" height="340" style="border:0;border-radius:12px;max-width:100%" loading="lazy" title="Does the Ichimoku Cloud strategy beat buy & hold on Silver (SLV ETF)?"></iframe>See which strategies actually beat buy & hold — and which only look like they do.
Free, in seconds, no sign-up. Put any famous strategy to the proof the honest way — real costs, every loss shown, measured against simply holding — so a tip, a guru, or your own hope can't fool you.
- Prove any strategy — free
- See if it's an edge, or just luck
- Read today's names that cleared every check
Put it to the proof the honest way — real costs, every loss, measured against simply holding. Free, no sign-up.
Prove it →Paste their exact claim and watch the honest engine put it to the test — free, losses and all.
Test the claim →Check a strategy against the real drawdown and profit-target rules of a prop-firm evaluation.
Put it through →an honest backtest — real costs on, measured against simply buying & holding
- • The strategy line is Ichimoku Cloud on Silver (SLV ETF); the dashed line is simply buying and holding SLV. Beating the dashed line is the whole point — many strategies don't.
- • Max drawdown is the worst peak-to-trough fall you'd have sat through. A higher return with a much deeper drawdown is not obviously better.
- • Every fill assumes next-open execution with costs & slippage on — no acting on prices you couldn't have known.
- • A small number of trades means a small sample. Treat a great-looking result on a handful of trades with suspicion.
This is a hypothetical backtest of a well-known mechanism on past data. It is not advice, not a prediction, and not a claim that the strategy works. We hold no funds and place no orders. The value here is the ability to test an idea honestly — see where it would have helped, and where it would have hurt — before you ever risk real money on your own broker.
How this is computed → · who's behind it · where a backtest fits
See what actually beats buy & hold — most don't, here are the rare few that do →