Gartner — where this name stands on our checks today
A present-tense read of how this name grades on the same mechanical checks we run on every name — business quality first — beside what its setups have actually done before. A quality read to test yourself, not a call on where the price is going.
Where this name stands on our checks today
Clears our checks
Graded on the Oct 28, 2026 close by our automated checks · published Oct 29, 2026 at 07:05 UTC · Produced by the operator, who designs and runs the automated checks · Who runs Stratsemble →
This name cleared every mechanical check that applies to it today. A quality read, business quality first — not a prediction it will rise.
Cleared our checks on every read since the Oct 27, 2026 close
A read of our mechanical checks as of today — business quality first, not a forecast that it will rise or fall, and not a buy. You decide, on your own broker.
We trade the same universe of names through our own separate system, so we're not a disinterested party. This read is impersonal — identical for everyone, never tailored to you — and it is never a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold.
This is a read of our mechanical checks as of today — a quality read, not a forecast that it will rise or fall. We never claim where a price is going.
Our scorecard checks each call after 63 or 252 trading days, depending on the check it cleared. How our own calls have actually done → How we read a name →
Grade history
▸▾
Dates are the US closes we graded; each read is normally published the next morning (UTC). Our record of it begins the Oct 9, 2026 close. Up to the Oct 19, 2026 close, we kept each close's final grade only. History, not a signal.
- since the Oct 27, 2026 close, through our latest read (the Oct 28, 2026 close)
- Oct 12–19, 2026 · didn't clear our checks on the Oct 20, 2026 read
What our famous strategies are doing on this name today
As of Oct 28, 2026.
These are the present mechanical states of famous public rules on this name — a factual snapshot, not a signal to act and not our own position. We trade the same universe through our own separate system, so this is impersonal, never a recommendation to buy, sell or hold.
What these setups have done on this name before
The measured record of each famous rule's past trades on this name — how often it reached its own exit in profit, and how often it fell short, misses shown first. A record to test, never a tip to act on.
200-Day MA Regime
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (13 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
52-Week High Breakout
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (4 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Small sample — treat with suspicion; a handful of trades can look authoritative without being so.
ADX / DMI Trend
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (16 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Aroon
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (25 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Awesome Oscillator
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (27 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Bollinger Band Breakout
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (23 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Bollinger Band Reversion
Of its past trades on this name, about 7 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 3 in 10 closed in the red (38 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Commodity Channel Index
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (31 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Chaikin Money Flow
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (52 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Connors RSI-2
Of its past trades on this name, about 7 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 3 in 10 closed in the red (31 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Donchian Breakout
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (21 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Fair Value Gap
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (52 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
False Break
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (36 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Heikin-Ashi Trend
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (160 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Ichimoku Cloud
Of its past trades on this name, about 2 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 8 in 10 closed in the red (13 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Keltner Channel Breakout
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (14 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
MACD
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (38 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Money Flow Index
Of its past trades on this name, about 8 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 2 in 10 closed in the red (4 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Small sample — treat with suspicion; a handful of trades can look authoritative without being so.
Time-Series Momentum
Of its past trades on this name, about 8 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 2 in 10 closed in the red (4 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Small sample — treat with suspicion; a handful of trades can look authoritative without being so.
Moving Average Crossover
Too few past triggers on this name to judge the odds honestly — a setup to test, not a track record.
On-Balance Volume
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (21 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Parabolic SAR
Of its past trades on this name, about 4 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 6 in 10 closed in the red (53 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
RSI Reversion
Of its past trades on this name, about 8 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 2 in 10 closed in the red (9 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Small sample — treat with suspicion; a handful of trades can look authoritative without being so.
Stochastic RSI
Of its past trades on this name, about 6 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 4 in 10 closed in the red (46 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Stochastic Oscillator
Of its past trades on this name, about 7 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 3 in 10 closed in the red (35 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
SuperTrend
Too few past triggers on this name to judge the odds honestly — a setup to test, not a track record.
TTM Squeeze
Of its past trades on this name, about 3 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 7 in 10 closed in the red (19 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Vortex Indicator
Of its past trades on this name, about 5 in 10 closed in profit after real costs, and 5 in 10 closed in the red (63 trades, 5 yrs). Held so far — not proof.
Based on this name's own price data through Oct 28, 2026.
Measured over one mostly-rising market — a different regime can flip any of this.
One limit, stated plainly: the names we can read are the ones still trading today, so a record like this reads kinder than the whole truth until enough names that have left are counted. Weigh it accordingly.
Our locked calls on this name
Every GO we've called on this name, locked in our ledger the day we made it and graded later against a standard we fixed before the window — misses shown as plainly as hits. A record to hold us to, never a call to act on.
Building this name's record: 2 calls locked. We show a hit-rate here only once enough have been graded — never a figure off too few.
Locked in our ledger on the Oct 12, 2026 read. We post the graded verdict after 63 trading days (around Jan 11, 2027 — the date we grade it, not a date to act on). Nothing has matured yet, so there is no score to show.
Independently captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine on Oct 15, 2026. The day's root hash and leaf list in that snapshot are fixed — recompute the root from the published leaves and compare it to today's; if we ever rewrote a call, the root would no longer match the one that snapshot holds.
Locked in our ledger on the Oct 12, 2026 read. We post the graded verdict after 252 trading days (around Oct 12, 2027 — the date we grade it, not a date to act on). Nothing has matured yet, so there is no score to show.
Independently captured by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine on Oct 15, 2026. The day's root hash and leaf list in that snapshot are fixed — recompute the root from the published leaves and compare it to today's; if we ever rewrote a call, the root would no longer match the one that snapshot holds.
Cite this read
Source: Stratsemble — As of October 28, 2026, Stratsemble's mechanical checks read Gartner (IT) as 'Clears our checks' — a present-tense quality read of how it grades on the same checks we run on every name, business quality first: a quality screen, not a sign the price is going anywhere, and our honest prior is no edge. We have locked and date-stamped 2 past calls on IT in our ledger, each graded later against a standard we fixed before the window — misses shown as plainly as hits. The record is independently captured by the Internet Archive. This read is impersonal — identical for everyone, and we trade the same universe through our own separate system, so we are not a disinterested party — it is not advice and not a forecast that the price will rise or fall, and never a recommendation to buy, sell or hold.
Not advice to buy, sell, or size anything. The checks are mechanical; what you do with them is your own call, on your own broker.
Our honest prior is no edge. Clearing our checks is a quality screen, business first — not a sign a name will go up, and an earlier test of the strength signal was not predictive. Until the record says otherwise, treat it as: no move we can stand behind.
One limit, stated plainly: the names we can read are the ones still trading today, so a record like this reads kinder than the whole truth until enough names that have left are counted. Weigh it accordingly.
How every backtest here is computed → This read is dated and refreshes on the nightly run. It is not time-sensitive and is never a reason to act today.
How this is computed → (closed-bar, costs on, vs buy & hold — the full method.)
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. This is an educational, analytical tool — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. You make all decisions and execute on your own broker.
Hypothetical performance disclaimer (CFTC Rule 4.41)
HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.
By viewing this read, you agree to our Terms of Use and Disclaimer. Results are hypothetical and educational — not investment advice. You decide and execute on your own broker.