Chaikin Money Flow strategy — on every asset
Chaikin Money Flow measures, for each bar, where the close finished inside the bar's high-low range (near the high means buying pressure, near the low means selling pressure), weights that by the bar's volume, and averages it over a lookback window to a reading between -1 and +1. Above zero suggests volume is flowing in ('accumulation'); below zero, out ('distribution'). This rule goes long while the reading is above its zero line and steps aside below - a trend/accumulation reading of volume flow, related to but not the same as On-Balance Volume (which uses close-to-close direction rather than the close's position inside each bar). It lags turns and whipsaws in sideways markets. A bar with no range contributes a neutral zero rather than a fabricated reading, so one flat bar does not blank the line; only a volume-less feed (or the warm-up) leaves no reading at all.
Through a sustained one-way move — By construction it stays long while the volume-weighted flow reading holds above zero and steps aside below — a zero-line trend read of accumulation.
In a choppy, sideways range — In a sideways range the reading crosses zero back and forth — it whipsaws and lags every real turn by design, and on thin or patchy volume it carries little information.
Whether that behaviour produced excess return on your asset over your window is exactly what your backtest measures — we publish no profit claims.
How it works — step by step
- • Entry — Go long when the reading is above its zero line (accumulation).
- • Exit — Go flat when it drops below zero (distribution).
- • Fills, scoring & data — Every backtest fills at the next real open and scores on the real price against a real buy-and-hold, never a smoothed or derived series; a bar with no range contributes a neutral zero, not a fabricated reading, and on a volume-less feed there is no reading at all.
Most of these did not beat buy & hold — but a real few did, and finding out which is the whole point. This one strategy was tested on 91 different assets. With that many attempts, some will beat buy & hold by chance alone — which is why these are listed neutrally, not ranked by which ones came out ahead. To see whether any single result survives scrutiny, run the out-of-sample, walk-forward and multiple-testing checks on its backtest.
Of the 91 with enough data to judge, 20 beat buy & hold. Results are simulated backtests over the last ~5 years (less for younger assets), shown whole — losses included — not live or future performance. These are famous names that still trade today. Names that delisted, went bankrupt or were wound down aren't in the set (survivorship bias) — and that history isn't available from the free public data this tool runs on — so this rate isn't a representative base rate for every stock or ETF that has ever traded.
Listed in a neutral catalog order — not ranked by performance. Combinations we can't judge yet — too little data — are grouped separately below.
Here, “beat” means only a higher total return than buy & hold over this one past window — not risk-adjusted, not luck-checked. The out-of-sample, walk-forward and luck checks live on each individual backtest.
Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. This is an educational, analytical tool — not investment advice, and not a recommendation to buy or sell anything. You make all decisions and execute on your own broker.
HYPOTHETICAL OR SIMULATED PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE CERTAIN LIMITATIONS. UNLIKE AN ACTUAL PERFORMANCE RECORD, SIMULATED RESULTS DO NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL TRADING. ALSO, SINCE THE TRADES HAVE NOT BEEN EXECUTED, THE RESULTS MAY HAVE UNDER- OR OVER-COMPENSATED FOR THE IMPACT, IF ANY, OF CERTAIN MARKET FACTORS, SUCH AS LACK OF LIQUIDITY. SIMULATED TRADING PROGRAMS IN GENERAL ARE ALSO SUBJECT TO THE FACT THAT THEY ARE DESIGNED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN.
On the 91 assets with enough data to judge, the same rule swung from +287 pts vs buy & hold on Solana to -1088 pts on Micron Technology. The typical (median) result was -50.5 pts — and even across these runs, the deepest drawdown you'd have sat through was -93% on Litecoin.
That range is the whole point: one rule is not universally good or bad — it depends entirely on the asset, and with 91 tried, some beat by chance. Shown to reveal the variation, not to pick one to trade.
Chaikin Money Flow on stocks
Razor-thin margin — effectively a tie.
Razor-thin margin — effectively a tie.
Razor-thin margin — effectively a tie.
Razor-thin margin — effectively a tie.
Chaikin Money Flow on etfs
Chaikin Money Flow on commodities
Chaikin Money Flow on crypto
Backtesting is one stage of preparing to trade, not the finish line. The full discipline runs five: Understand, Test, Stress-test, Forward-test, then Decide — eyes open. The rare idea that survives all five is the one worth taking into the market with your eyes open — and every stage before it is a place to stop, for free, as most ideas wash out in the first three. Finding that rare idea before you risk a cent is the whole point.